The Supreme Court has admitted a petition
challenging the appointment of S R Mohanty (IAS:1982:MP) as Chief Secretary of
Madhya Pradesh on the ground that he was allegedly involved in a corruption
case pertaining to state industrial development corporation. Accordingly, a
bench of CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Sanjiv Khanna issued a notice to the
Centre and sought its reply in six weeks. Senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for
petitioner Manohar Dalal, said that the present case demonstrates a glaring
abuse of power by Mohanty. He argued that the charge of abuse of power
is established by the fact that DG EOW who was probing the corruption case
against him was removed on January 02, immediately after Mohanty took charge as
chief secretary on December 31, 2018. Singh said the DG of EOW was appointed only
six months before that but was replaced. The petitioner had sought directions for
quashing Mohanty's appointment and a fresh departmental inquiry against him. Dalal also pleaded for transferring the case
registered by EOW against Mohanty to CBI for further investigation. He sought
that fresh departmental inquiry be held under the supervision of a retired
judge of the apex court or the high court. The petitioner, a practicing advocate in MP
High Court said that Mohanty is also required to be shifted from the critical
and important post of Chief Secretary as was done in the corruption case
against Neera Yadav, who was chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. "During his tenure as the Managing
Director of MPSIDC from 2000-2004, SR Mohanty disbursed loans in violation of
the decisions of the state government and contrary to Article of Association of
MPSIDC," the plea said. It added that the Comptroller and Auditor
General of India (CAG) in its 2003 report had pointed out that MPSIDC which was
under Mohanty, illegally disbursed financial assistance without the approval of
the state government and contrary to the provisions of Article of Association. Referring to a report of Raghav Chandra, who
was a successor to Mohanty in MPSIDC, the plea said that he had pointed out
that Mohanty disbursed Rs 91.57 crore to 18 borrowers, of which some were fake
companies. The state government then sent a report to
the state EOW which on detailed inquiry registered FIR in 2004 against 84
persons including Mohanty for abusing his official position by conniving with
private companies and had caused loss to the state government. "Despite serious corruption case pending
against SR Mohanty, the newly elected state government, which came back into
power after 15 years, appointed him as the chief secretary of the state of
Madhya Pradesh on December 31, 2018," it said. It said that before the appointment of
Mohanty as chief secretary, the state government had completed the departmental
inquiry, pending against him for 11 years, within one week and exonerated him
of all charges. "The entire inquiry was a farce and
concluded post haste only to exonerate SR Mohanty so that he can be appointed
as Chief Secretary," it said, adding that immediately after being
appointed Mohanty on January 2, transferred the Madhu Kumar as DG of EOW and
replaced him with a new officer. "The state government has decided that
through newly appointed director general of EOW, it would withdraw the
corruption charges against SR Mohanty pending before the competent court,"
the plea said. It further said that the state government has
also decided to withdraw a case against Mohanty pending in the apex court. "The closure of such a serious
corruption case against senior official would also amount to a miscarriage of
justice, who abused his official position and caused loss to the state
exchequer", it said.
The Supreme Court has admitted a petition
challenging the appointment of S R Mohanty (IAS:1982:MP) as Chief Secretary of
Madhya Pradesh on the ground that he was allegedly involved in a corruption
case pertaining to state industrial development corporation. Accordingly, a
bench of CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Sanjiv Khanna issued a notice to the
Centre and sought its reply in six weeks.
Senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for petitioner Manohar Dalal, said that the present case demonstrates a glaring abuse of power by Mohanty.
He argued that the charge of abuse of power is established by the fact that DG EOW who was probing the corruption case against him was removed on January 02, immediately after Mohanty took charge as chief secretary on December 31, 2018.
Singh said the DG of EOW was appointed only six months before that but was replaced.
The petitioner had sought directions for quashing Mohanty's appointment and a fresh departmental inquiry against him.
Dalal also pleaded for transferring the case registered by EOW against Mohanty to CBI for further investigation. He sought that fresh departmental inquiry be held under the supervision of a retired judge of the apex court or the high court.
The petitioner, a practicing advocate in MP High Court said that Mohanty is also required to be shifted from the critical and important post of Chief Secretary as was done in the corruption case against Neera Yadav, who was chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh.
"During his tenure as the Managing Director of MPSIDC from 2000-2004, SR Mohanty disbursed loans in violation of the decisions of the state government and contrary to Article of Association of MPSIDC," the plea said.
It added that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) in its 2003 report had pointed out that MPSIDC which was under Mohanty, illegally disbursed financial assistance without the approval of the state government and contrary to the provisions of Article of Association.
Referring to a report of Raghav Chandra, who was a successor to Mohanty in MPSIDC, the plea said that he had pointed out that Mohanty disbursed Rs 91.57 crore to 18 borrowers, of which some were fake companies.
The state government then sent a report to the state EOW which on detailed inquiry registered FIR in 2004 against 84 persons including Mohanty for abusing his official position by conniving with private companies and had caused loss to the state government.
"Despite serious corruption case pending against SR Mohanty, the newly elected state government, which came back into power after 15 years, appointed him as the chief secretary of the state of Madhya Pradesh on December 31, 2018," it said.
It said that before the appointment of Mohanty as chief secretary, the state government had completed the departmental inquiry, pending against him for 11 years, within one week and exonerated him of all charges.
"The entire inquiry was a farce and concluded post haste only to exonerate SR Mohanty so that he can be appointed as Chief Secretary," it said, adding that immediately after being appointed Mohanty on January 2, transferred the Madhu Kumar as DG of EOW and replaced him with a new officer.
"The state government has decided that through newly appointed director general of EOW, it would withdraw the corruption charges against SR Mohanty pending before the competent court," the plea said.
It further said that the state government has also decided to withdraw a case against Mohanty pending in the apex court.
"The closure of such a serious corruption case against senior official would also amount to a miscarriage of justice, who abused his official position and caused loss to the state exchequer", it said.