Chandigarh (20.01.2026): A Panchkula court has discharged Vijay Dahiya (IAS: 2001: HY) in a corruption case after the Haryana Government refused to grant prosecution sanction against him. State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) told the court that after completing the investigation against Dahiya, the competent authority was approached for prosecution sanction in 2024, 2025, and 2025. However, the Chief Secretary’s office vide letter dated January 9, 2026, declined to grant sanction. Hence, the ACB was not inclined to present a chargesheet against Dahiya.
The court observed, “It is well-settled that a sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, is a condition precedent for taking cognisance of offences alleged against a public servant for acts done in discharge of official duties. In the absence of a valid prosecution sanction, the Court is legally barred from proceeding further against such an accused.”
IAS officer discharged after Govt refuses prosecution sanction
By IndianMandarins - 2026-01-20 11:53:00
Chandigarh (20.01.2026): A Panchkula court has discharged Vijay Dahiya (IAS: 2001: HY) in a corruption case after the Haryana Government refused to grant prosecution sanction against him. State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) told the court that after completing the investigation against Dahiya, the competent authority was approached for prosecution sanction in 2024, 2025, and 2025. However, the Chief Secretary’s office vide letter dated January 9, 2026, declined to grant sanction. Hence, the ACB was not inclined to present a chargesheet against Dahiya.
The court observed, “It is well-settled that a sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, is a condition precedent for taking cognisance of offences alleged against a public servant for acts done in discharge of official duties. In the absence of a valid prosecution sanction, the Court is legally barred from proceeding further against such an accused.”